Posts Tagged ‘censorship’

Where’s the inspiration for future artists?

// June 16th, 2011 // 2 Comments » // Discussion, Illustration, Inspiration

At the time of writing this I’ve got Don Bluth’s ‘Titan A.E.’ on in the background. In my opinion it’s an underrated film (much like many of Don Bluth’s feature films) but it got me thinking about a film I absolutely loved as a child, The Secret of NIMH.

If you haven’t seen ‘NIMH’ and you’re a fan of animation then I can’t recommend it highly enough. Don Bluth’s work was rivalling that of Disney’s at the time and presented a more sophisticated and somewhat darker style of animation that respected it’s audience rather than dumbing itself down.

So why all this rambling about The Secret of NIMH and it’s style? Well while searching the internet to see if there was any news of an upcoming ‘Blu-ray’ edition I found this unfortunate image of the DVD release:

Not sure where to begin here. Firstly this looks about as far as you can get from the film, it doesn’t capture the mood or anything about the story but places the now bright, colourful and somewhat cheaply illustrated main characters smiling all together with not a care in the world. This couldn’t be further from the truth in terms of plot and animation style.

It’s not just the artwork that suffers. It shows how much as a society we closet our youth from anything that might be somewhat ‘real’ or intriguing. The design is clearly advertising the film as something it’s not and this false advertising ruins the film for an audience expecting to see something completely different. Ironically The Secret of NIMH does deal with issues that everyone can relate to. From death and the scientific testing of animals to love and a mother’s courage to protect her family at any cost this film inspires and respects its audience enough to enjoy it on many levels. It’s thought provoking even for a child and Don Bluth’s animation is the perfect tool to distance the child from a harsh reality but at the same time still teaching.

Now if I can show off one of the posters for the film on it’s original release:

This poster filled me with wonder and curiosity. There’s so much going on, so much detail and character in the illustration that it immediately captures my attention. More than that, it tells the story of a struggle, not every thing’s fluffy and light and ‘full of Disney songs’.

Even in An American Tail, regarded more as a Don Bluth film with a wider appeal, the poster artwork was impressive and detailed. It tells the story in one frame simply and effectively:

Unfortunately the same cannot be said for the DVD release:

More and more I find artwork that looks lazy or cheaply put together without any storytelling ability. I always thought the phrase was, ‘A picture is worth a thousand words’… and I can only see about one.

Manic Street Preachers Album Cover RANT!

// May 14th, 2009 // No Comments » // Site News


From an artist’s perspective I feel deeply unsettled at the amount of censorship we have to face simply because people don’t want to appear to offend. The reason we are so ‘offended’ is because we’ve been told what to be offended by and so my rant continues…

Its not often that something so stupid really gets me outraged but I don’t think I can sit back and say nothing. Reading on the BBC website today I was shocked to discover that supermarkets are to be covering the Manic Street Preachers latest album with a blank slipcase because apparently the artwork is deemed ‘inappropriate’.

Ok so take a look at the artwork, yes I’ll admit that it can look as though the girl has been beaten and is splattered with blood, on the other hand it also looks like an artistic style has been applied to this image. Jenny Saville the artist that did this piece has a verty distinct style in which you can see the brushstrokes in the shapes that she paints. Again if you see any of her other work you can understand my meaning which by the way is shown in many art galleries to which the same public can see at anytime. My point is that REGARDLESS of what the image is representing it should not be covered up. I see a fantastic piece of artwork that instantly brings a reaction to the eye, beautiful brushstrokes and an amazing style. The immediate reaction for the supermarkets to hide this image immediately presumes that it is supposed to depict something we SHOULDN’T see and who’s to say that should be so?

We as a society are increasingly being wrapped up in a blanket and protected from the dangers and realism of the outside world. We are told what to see and what not to see, our minds are being made up before we even have a chance to judge for ourselves. It’s the same in the media with headlines pushing the ‘FEAR FACTOR’ and constantly scaring society with news of attacks, bombs, wars and more.

I suppose one my main gripes about this is that even before its been released to the public, the decision has been made to censor something that hasn’t even had a complaint. I sincerely hope that we can all get off our asses and stop worrying about who’s offending who and start to create and make each other think more.

So what do you think, were the supermarkets correct to censor the artwork?

- Jason